Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Steinmetz v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 2:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hirsh Steinmetz
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
J.L.T. et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 1:2016cv01302
Plaintiff:
J.L.T. and Debra Toney
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Sears Robuck and Co
as 4:2015cv01707
Plaintiff:
Connie Johnson
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirksey v. Schindler Elevator Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Tyra Kirksey
Defendant:
Schindler Elevator Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirksey v. Schindler Elevator Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Tyra Kirksey
Defendant:
Schindler Elevator Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cannon v. Sears Roebuck and Co et al
as 2:2014cv01560
Plaintiff:
Wayne Cannon
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co , Orgill Inc and Truper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dean v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2013cv00487
Plaintiff:
Anita Dean
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Lauren Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grzala v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 7:2009cv02201
Plaintiff:
Ivy Grzala, Ivy Grzala and Ivy Grzala
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Massey v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 2:2008cv00957
Plaintiff:
Ruth Keith Massey
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co and Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McBee et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2007cv00860
Plaintiff:
McKenna McBee, Craig McBee and Kimberly McBee
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co., General Electric Company, Alice Greenlay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
