Cases 11 - 20 of 64
GIFFORD v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 2:2016cv02557
Plaintiff:
GERARD GIFFORD
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 5:2016cv02533
Plaintiff:
DAVID SMITH and WENDY SMITH
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERSHORIN et al v. SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY
as 2:2015cv06816
Plaintiff:
MARC HERSHORIN and MINDY HERSHORIN
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GANGJI et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 5:2015cv05926
Plaintiff:
MURTAZA GANGJI and MASUMA GANGJI
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. , SEARS PROTECTION COMPANY , SEARS HOME SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 5:2015cv05022
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIELS v. SEARS et al
as 2:2015cv04821
Plaintiff:
BETTIE DANIELS
Defendant:
SEARS and SEARS ROEBUCKS AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fassett et al v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00941
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fassett and Leslie Fassett
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation , Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE et al v. SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
as 5:2014cv02002
Plaintiff:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Defendant:
SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Movant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAN OSTEN et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 2:2014cv00314
Plaintiff:
MARCIA VAN OSTEN and WAYNE VAN OSTEN
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
