Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Sears v. Pipe Trades Industry Health and Welfare Plan
as 2:2018cv01517
Defendant:
Pipe Trades Industry Health and Welfare Plan
Plaintiff:
Brenda F Sears
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Glaeser v. K Mart Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Andrew Glaeser
Defendant:
K Mart Corporation , Sears Holdings Long-Term Disability Plan and Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Tsann Kuen (Zhangzhou) Enterprise, Co., Ltd. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00866
Plaintiff:
Tsann Kuen (Zhangzhou) Enterprise, Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Home Depot USA, Inc. , Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Sears Outlet Stores LLC
as 2:2014cv01176
Defendant:
Sears Outlet Stores LLC
Plaintiff:
Randye Patton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
K., M. et al v. Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products, N.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00606
Plaintiff:
M. K. and Courtney Schroeder
Defendant:
Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products, N.A., Inc. and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
McLaurin et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 2:2012cv01234
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co
Plaintiff:
Nolan McLaurin and Louis Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Balele, Pastori v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 3:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Pastori M. Balele
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
