Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Walker v. Health International Corporation, et al
as 1:2012cv03256
Plaintiff:
Andre Walker
Defendant:
Fitness Quest, Health International Corporation, HSN, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101 (35:101 Patent Infringement)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Trujillo v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 1:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Theresa Trujillo
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Downs et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2011cv02225
Plaintiff:
Brad Downs and Teresa Downs
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seamands, et al v. Sears Holdings Corporation, et al
as 11-3221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARA SEAMANDS, individually and on behalf of a class of other similarly situated, RONALD LOCKHART, GLENN BURROWS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., SEARS OUTLET STORES, LLC and others
GSL Holdings v. UPM Marketing et al
as 2:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
GSL Holdings
Defendant:
UPM Marketing, Electronic Educational Devices, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
RG Properties v. UPM Marketing et al
as 2:2011cv00317
Plaintiff:
RG Properties
Defendant:
UPM Marketing, Electronic Educational Devices, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Intelligent Designs 2000 Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2011cv00437
Plaintiff:
Intelligent Designs 2000 Corp.
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Sprint Nextel Corporation, Homer TLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Baker v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2010cv02579
Plaintiff:
Dorothy W. Baker
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dreiling v. Sears Roebuck and Co.
as 5:2010cv04128
Plaintiff:
Rita Dreiling
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
