Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
Lori Rodriguez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-17144
Plaintiff - Appellant: LORI RODRIGUEZ, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC. and CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STEVEN VALENTINE
Lori Rodriguez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al
as 17-17144
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., LORI RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STEVEN VALENTINE
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-15449
Plaintiff - Appellant: IVAN PENA, ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON and others
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley
as 15-15449
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON, BRETT THOMAS and others
Defendant / Appellee: STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Jeff Silvester, et al v. Kamala Harris
as 14-16840
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION, ABRAHAM LINCOLN FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: JEFF SILVESTER, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., a non-profit organization, BRANDON COMBS and others
Defendant / Appellant: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California, in her official capacity
Jeff Silvester, et al v. Kamala Harris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16840
Plaintiff - Appellee: JEFF SILVESTER, BRANDON COMBS, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., a non-profit organization and others
Defendant - Appellant: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California, in her official capacity
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Mark Haynie, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-15531
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK AARON HAYNIE, BRENDAN JOHN RICHARDS, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General of California (in her official capacity) and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Mark Haynie, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 14-15531
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., BRENDAN JOHN RICHARDS, MARK AARON HAYNIE and others
Defendant / Appellee: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General of California (in her official capacity) and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?