Cases 61 - 70 of 1,563
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Szczepaniak v. Riddle et al
as 1:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Marcin Maciej Szczepaniak
Defendant:
Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
City of Hammond, et al v. Lake County Board of Elections, et al
as 24-1125
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MCDERMOTT, EDUARDO FONTANEZ, LONNIE RANDOLPH and others
Defendant:
LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DIEGO MORALES, Secretary of State, in his official capacity and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
