Cases 21 - 30 of 5,517
Hale Harris v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10767
Petitioner:
HALE R. HARRIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Zachary Littleton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10750
Petitioner:
ZACHARY ANTWANN LITTLETON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Eli Malave v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10746
Petitioner:
ELI LONG MALAVE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gaynett Powell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10721
Plaintiff:
GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX, MARK INCH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Floyd v. Secretary Department of Corrections
as 5:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Craig Floyd
Respondent:
Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Hamilton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10716
Petitioner:
DAVID C. HAMILTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
John Andrews v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10683
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANDREWS
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WARDEN, APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Gregory Tolliver v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al
as 24-10643
Petitioner:
GREGORY A. TOLLIVER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jonas Griffin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10632
Petitioner:
JONAS TRAMELL GRIFFIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ambrose Vogds v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10627
Petitioner:
AMBROSE VOGDS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
