Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lopez v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael Lopez
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Alisha Tafoya-Lucero, Secretary of Corrections, Hope Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Derrick Humphrey
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Secretary of Corrections and Robert Wilius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Egerton v. MTC et al
as 1:2021cv00859
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Egerton
Defendant:
MTC, Rick Martinez, Anthony Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Grisham et al
as 2:2021cv00656
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Stone
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham, State of New Mexico Department of Corrections, Secretary of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fawley v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 2:2020cv01236
Respondent:
Dwayne Satatisteran, Jane/John Doe, Alisha Tafoya-Lucero, Secretary of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Benjamin W. Fawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGhee v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01158
Defendant:
Dwayne Santiestevan, Secretary of Corrections and GEO
Plaintiff:
William McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Director of Prisons et al
as 1:2018cv01091
Plaintiff:
Jacob R Pratt
Defendant:
Secretary of Corrections, FNU LNU, Director of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00448
Plaintiff:
Gerald Johnson
Defendant:
Secretary of Corrections, Director of Adult Prisons, Management and Training Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain et al v. Aragon et al
as 1:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Paul Cain, Ralph Maestas, Steven Pike and others
Defendant:
FNU Aragon, E. Bravo, R. Ulibarri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
