Cases 11 - 20 of 112
AAPS v. ABIM
as 23-40423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation, AAPS
Defendant / Appellee:
American Board of Internal Medicine, ABIM, American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology, ABOG, American Board of Family Medicine, ABFM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gaytan Mendoza v. Mayorkas
as 23-20043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Maria Daniel Gaytan Mendoza
Defendant / Appellee:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ur M. Jaddou and Carroll Wallace
El Paso Paper Box v. OCAHO
as 23-60039
Petitioner:
El Paso Paper Box, Incorporated
Respondent:
Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer and Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Babai v. USA
as 22-20602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mohammed R. Babai
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Juarez-Morales v. Mayorkas
as 22-60559
Petitioner:
Oscar Rafael Juarez-Morales
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Job v. Jaddou et al
as 4:2022cv03017
Plaintiff:
Stuart Job
Defendant:
Ur M. JADDOU, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary DHS-Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
