Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Alavifoumani et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2022cv03921
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Elhamosadat Alavifoumani and Mr. Boshra Mortazavizanjani
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Anotny J. Blinken, Secretary of State, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cook County, Illinois et al v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2019cv06334
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI II, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, a federal agency and others
Plaintiff:
Cook County, Illinois, an Illinois governmental entity, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Inc. and Cook County, Illinois
Amicus Curiae:
Nevada Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violence, Sexual Violence Law Center, Equip for Equality and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Pouya v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv04816
Petitioner:
Amir Pouya
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Ruth Dorchoff, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03292
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
