Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diana King et al v. Select Comfort Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv01362
Plaintiff:
Savana King and Diana King
Defendant:
Select Comfort Corporation, Sleep Number Corporation and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv06446
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Wendy Rago v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation, et al
as 5:2018cv00365
Defendant:
Does and Select Comfort Retail Corporation
Plaintiff:
Wendy Rago
American National Manufacturing Inc. et al v. Select Comfort Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00582
Plaintiff:
American National Manufacturing Inc. and Dires LLC
Defendant:
Select Comfort Corporation and Select Comfort SC Corporation
Select Comfort Corporation v. Lateral Monopoly LLC d/b/a Sleep Alternatives et al
as 2:2011at00803
Plaintiff:
Select Comfort Corporation
Defendant:
Lateral Monopoly LLC d/b/a Sleep Alternatives, Christopher Kelso, David Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Select Comfort Corporation v. Lateral Monopoly LLC, et al
as 2:2011cv01488
Plaintiff:
Select Comfort Corporation
Defendant:
Christopher Kelso, David Stephens and Lateral Monopoly LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
