Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tulowitzky v. Burley et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
William Tulowitzky
Defendant:
Katrina Burley, C/O White, C/O Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Heishman et al
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Franklin Wright
Defendant:
Heishman, Demby Mucha, Dicampli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casson v. Currington et al
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Malcom Casson
Defendant:
Sgt. Currington, Sgt. Howard, Sgt. Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ramos
Defendant:
C/O Henry, Sgt. Edwards, Lt. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Timothy Radcliff, Perry Phelps, Phil Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Sullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adger et al v. Carney et al
as 1:2018cv02048
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crumpler, Antoine Jones, Eugene W. Wiggins and others
Defendant:
Sgt. Ronald Frederick, Lt. Justin Atherholt, Governor John Carney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fatir et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir, Malachai DeBruce, Antonio R. Bailey and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Dana Metzger, Jane Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00700
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections, Michael Stanford, Darold Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00829
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
