Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Parker Auto Body Inc., et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 16-15470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PARKER AUTO BODY INC., AUTO BODY SPECIALISTS, INC., EAGLE AUTO BODY & PAINT SERVICE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
:
SERVICE
Parker Auto Body Inc., et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 16-15470
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, THE, AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY CO., UNITED FIRE AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BROUILLETTES PAINT & BODY, LLC, BRILEYS PAINT & BODY, INC., LEJEUNES BODY WORKS, INC. and others
Sentry Insurance, et al v. Soseeah, et al
as 14-701
Petitioner:
SENTRY INSURANCE, a Mutual Company, and any other related business entities including parent companies, consolidated tax filers and subsidiaries including, DAIRYLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, PEAK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Respondent:
DELBERT SOSEEAH, for himself and others similarly situated, MAXINE SOSEEAH, for herself and others similarly situated and JOHN BORREGO, for himself and others similarly situated
Parker Auto Body Inc et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co et al
as 6:2014cv06004
Plaintiff:
Taylor Auto Body L L C, Johnnies Paint & Body Shop Inc, Ginns Automotive Frame Shop L L C and others
Defendant:
Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, American National General Insurance Co, Travelers Indemnity Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
In re: Auto Body Shop Antitrust Litigation
as 6:2014md02557
Defendant:
First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc., Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, Foremost County Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Auto Body L L C, Ginns Automotive Frame Shop L L C, Alexander Body Shop, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
A & E Auto Body, Inc. et al v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv00310
Plaintiff:
A & E Auto Body, Inc. , American Paint & Body, Inc. , Auto & Coach Works of Central FL Inc. and others
Defendant:
21st Century Centennial Insurance Company , Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company , Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and others
A & E Auto Body, Inc. et al v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv00310
Plaintiff:
Stewart Agency, Inc. doing business as Earl Stewart Toyota of North Palm Beach, Regal Pontiac, Inc., American Paint & Body, Inc. and others
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc., Security National Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
American International Group, et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., et al
as 12-1753
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INCORPORATED, AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL COUNCIL ON COMPENSATION INSURANCE, INCORPORATED, solely as Attorney-In-Fact for the participating companies of the National Workers Compensation Reinsurance Pool,
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., SENTRY INSURANCE A MUTUAL COMPANY, ACE INA HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Hy Cite Corporation v. Regal Ware, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00769
Plaintiff:
Hy Cite Corporation
Defendant:
Regal Ware, Inc.
Intervenor:
United States (intervenor) and Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
United States of America ex rel Dr. Kent Takemoto v. ACE Ltd. and ESIS, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00613
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel Dr. Kent Takemoto
Defendant:
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. , Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company , The Progressive Corporation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
