Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Burrell v. Mason
as 24-737
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BRYAN D. MASON, Sergeant; Clinton Correctional Facility, C.O. GORDON, Clinton Correctional Facility, C.O. DEYO, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Burrell v. Durkin
as 23-6689
Appellee:
MARY BETH GILLEN, Nurse; Clinton Correctional Facility, CHARLIE DURKIN, Lieutenant; Clinton Correctional Facility, KING, Sergeant; Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Appellant:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
JANQUISH, Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, JOHN DOE 1, Inmate; Clinton Correctional Facility, JOHN DOE 2, Inmate; Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Encarnacion v. Annucci
as 23-692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bernabe Encarnacion
Defendant / Appellee:
J. Spinner
Defendant:
David Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, Thomas Lavaley, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, John/Jane Doe 1, Acting Deputy Superintendent of Security, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Encarnacion v. Annucci
as 22-2913
Petitioner:
Bernabe Encarnacion
Respondent:
J. Spinner, Anthony Annucci, Commissioner of DOCCS, Albert Prack, Director, Special Housing Unit/Inmate Disciplinary Program and others
Heyliger v. Cymbrak
as 21-2825
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Cymbrak, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA A. Cymbrak, Christopher Lagree, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA C. Lagree, Kyle Guynup, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA Kile Guynup and others
Defendant:
A. Mussen, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, Kevin Wilcox, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA K. Wilcox, Liam Mahoney, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA L. Maloney and others
Anselmo v. Kirkpatrick
as 21-1467
Defendant:
Keysor, Deputy Superintendent of Administration, Clinton Correctional Facility, A. Aubin, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Ronald Wood, Sergeant, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Conrad Lavarnway, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Edward Bressette, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Gregory Cassidy, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Anselmo
Encarnacion v. Annucci
as 20-1967
Respondent:
Albert Prack, Director, Special Housing Unit/Inmate Disciplinary Program, John Does 1, Upstate Correctional Facility, Correctional Officers in Draft/ID Room on, A. Misercola, Investigator, DOCCS, Office of the Inspector General and others
Petitioner:
Bernabe Encarnacion, Bernabe Encarnacion 91-B-0943, Attica Correctional Facility, Box 149, Attica, NY 14011, 607-737-0850
Chavis v. Kirkpatrick
as 18-854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Chavis
Defendant - Appellee:
M. Kirkpatrick, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Christopher Miller, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Susan Peacock, Deputy Superintendent of Administration, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
H'Shaka v. O'Gorman
as 18-628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Imhotep H'Shaka
Defendant - Appellee:
James O'Gorman, Acting Deputy Commissioner for Correctional Facilities, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Maureen Bosco, Former Executive Director, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Deborah McCulloch, Executive Director, Central New York Psychiatric Center and others
Peele v. Annucci
as 17-1642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenney R. Peele
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert M. Donah, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Curtis E. Smith, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Paul L. Fletcher, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, D.O.C.C.S. Commissioner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
