Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Harp v. United States Army Special Operations Command
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Seth Harp
Defendant:
United States Army Special Operations Command
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Harp v. United States Space Force et al
as 1:2022cv00972
Plaintiff:
Seth Harp
Defendant:
United States Space Force, Department of The Air Force and Department Of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Harp v. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Seth Harp
Defendant:
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Kirk v. Santander Consumer USA
as 4:2020cv01286
Plaintiff:
Robert Seth Kirk
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc. and Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kaplan v. Holmes et al
as 3:2019cv00444
Defendant:
Lawrence Angelilli, Ganesh B Rao, Michael P Rafferty and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Kaplan
In re MoneyGram International Inc Derivative Litigation
as 3:2019cv00415
Defendant:
Lawrence Angelilli, Pamela H Patsley, Michael P Rafferty and others
Plaintiff:
Khon Meng Chew
In Re:
MoneyGram International Inc Derivative Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Angelo Kaplan
Aetna Inc., et al v. The People's Choice Hospital, LLC, et al
as 5:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
AETNA Life Insurance Company and Aetna Inc.
Defendant:
Seth Guterman, Integrityancillary Management, LLC, Mission Toxicology II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hulett v. National Government
as 3:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Seth Patrick Gabriel Hulett
Defendant:
National Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
