Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Scottsdale Insurance Company et al v. Seven Counties Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and Mental Health Risk Retention Group
Defendant:
Seven Counties Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Kentucky Employees Retirement, et al v. Seven Counties Services, Inc.
as 16-5644
Appellant Cross-Appellee:
KENTUCKY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
Appellee Cross-Appellant:
SEVEN COUNTIES SERVICES, INC.
Kentucky Employees Retirement, et al v. Seven Counties Services, Inc.
as 16-5569
Appellant:
KENTUCKY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
Appellee:
SEVEN COUNTIES SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00025
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
In re: KY Employ Ret Sys, et al
as 14-6482
Petitioner:
KENTUCKY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
Respondent:
SEVEN COUNTIES SERVICES, INC.
In re: KY Employ Ret Sys, et al
as 14-512
Petitioner:
KENTUCKY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
Respondent:
SEVEN COUNTIES SERVICES, INC.
Kentucky Employees Retirement System v. Seven Counties Services, Inc.
as 3:2014mc00019
Movant:
Kentucky Employees Retirement System and The Board of Trustees of the Kentucky Retirement Systems
Respondent:
Seven Counties Services, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00189
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.