Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brame v. Vaughn
as 3:2015cv01096
Plaintiff:
Shaun Brame
Defendant:
Chaplain Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brame v. Perdue et al
as 3:2015cv01093
Plaintiff:
Shaun Brame
Defendant:
C/O Perdue and Phillippe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brame v. Hodge et al
as 3:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
Shaun Brame
Defendant:
Mark Hodge, Storm, Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaun Brame v. Thomas J. Dart, et al
as 11-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUN BRAME
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Cook County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Executive Director, in his individual and official capacities, SUPERINTENDENT ANDREWS, Cook County Jail, in his individual and official capacities and others
Brame v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv07948
Plaintiff:
Shaun Brame
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Keefe Commissary Networks and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaun Brame v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 10-3831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUN BRAME
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois and CCDOC, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Executive Director of Cook County Jail, CHESTER PLAXICO, Superintendent of Division (10) Cook County Illinois, CCDOC Star #114 and others
Brame v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv07452
Plaintiff:
Shaun Brame
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Coorectional Officer Patel, Sgt. Thomson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brame v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv04176
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Salvador Godinez, John Mueller and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Brame
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brame v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv03441
Plaintiff:
Shaun Brame
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Salvador Godinez, Superintendant Snooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brame v. Dart
as 1:2009cv03966
Plaintiff:
Shaun Brame
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
