Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Montgomery v. Shelby County Correction Center et al
as 2:2012cv02418
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Donte' Montgomery
Defendant:
Shelby County Correction Center and Kathryn Reddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Shelby County et al.,
as 2:2012cv02418
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Donte' Montgomery
Defendant:
Shelby County Correction Center and Kathryn Reddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Coleman et al
as 2:2011cv02857
Plaintiff:
Ronald Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald Coleman, Mark Luttrell, Shelby County Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontaine v. Shelby County Correctional Center
as 2:2011cv02567
Plaintiff:
Antonio G. Fontaine, Sr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2011cv02513
Plaintiff:
Edward Moore
Defendant:
Shelby County Correctional Center, Medical Dept. and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2011cv02417
Plaintiff:
Edward Moore
Defendant:
Shelby County Correctional Center, Medical Department and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Shelby County Correction Center et al
as 2:2011cv02019
Plaintiff:
Billy Lewis Walker
Defendant:
Shelby County Correction Center, Mark Luttrell, James Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Shelby County Correction Center
as 2:2010cv02725
Petitioner:
Billy Lewis Walker
Respondent:
Shelby County Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harper v. Shelby County Correction Center
as 2:2009cv02838
Plaintiff:
Dantonio Sentell Harper
Defendant:
Shelby County Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rucker v. Shelby County Correction Center
as 2:2009cv02821
Plaintiff:
James E. Rucker
Defendant:
Shelby County Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
