Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Pennington v. Shelby County Division of Correction, et al

as 2:2017cv02473
Plaintiff:
Lavell Fontain Pennington
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Correction and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. Aramark et al

as 2:2017cv02183
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Nash
Defendant:
Aramark, Shirley Hayslett, Shelby County Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. Aramark et al
as 3:2017cv00371
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Nash
Defendant:
Aramark, Shirley Hayslett, Shelby County Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 2:2016cv02945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv02354
Plaintiff:
Tony Spencer
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Officer McClain and Prison Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sledge v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al

as 2:2016cv02259
Plaintiff:
Cordarlrius Sledge
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, David Dyson, Danny McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Shelby County Division of Corrections
as 2:2016cv02150
Petitioner:
Douglas Martinez
Respondent:
Shelby County Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knowles v. Gupton et al

as 2:2015cv02685
Plaintiff:
Jason Heath Knowles
Defendant:
William Gupton, Jr., Shelby County Division of Corrections, Samuel Overton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al

as 2:2015cv02618
Plaintiff:
Douglas Martinez
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, William Gupton, Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vester v. Shelby County Division of Corrections

as 2:2015cv02104
Plaintiff:
Carlos Vester
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.