Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cantu v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 3:2022cv01971
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cantu
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arguello v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 3:2018cv01279
Plaintiff:
Noe Arguello
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company and Does 1 Through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Restore Auto Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01696
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
Restore Auto Group, Inc. and Mark Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Wholesale Dealers Painting Products, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01009
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
Wholesale Dealers Painting Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Hernandez
as 3:2015cv01007
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
Marcos Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. JJT, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01947
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
JJT, Inc., John Tyczki and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. JB Collision Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01946
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
JB Collision Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Earl Scheib of California, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02646
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
Earl Scheib of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
