Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams, Jr. v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01083
Defendant:
CO Graves, CO Rodriguez, Captain Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Lilley
as 1:2021cv00702
Petitioner:
Keith Simms
Respondent:
Superintendent Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simms v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04977
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Simms
Defendant:
City of New York and Clynres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bacquie v. New York City et al
as 1:2017cv05390
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Bacquie
Defendant:
NYPD Hwy Officer Mitchell, New York City, Police Officer Genine O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phipps v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06603
Plaintiff:
Danny Phipps
Defendant:
City of New York, The State of New York, Monica Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell, Jr. v. New York City Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv02725
Plaintiff:
Daniel Powell, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Duffy, C.O. Conceptional, C.O. Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montalvo v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05671
Plaintiff:
Maritza Montalvo
Defendant:
The City of New York, Joshua Hammer, Michael Simms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch v. McKinnen et al
as 1:2010cv03289
Defendant:
A. Boyce, Harley Lapin, McKinnen and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alfredo Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Mahmoud et al
as 1:2009cv01450
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Mahmoud, Daughtry, Simms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
