Cases 1 - 10 of 16
REYES v. WILLIAMS SONOMA INC. et al
as 3:2024cv06359
Plaintiff:
LORENZO REYES
Defendant:
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC., SIMOS INSOURCING SOLUTIONS, INC. and MARK ALIPERTI
REYES v. WILLIAMS SONOMA INC. et al
as 1:2024cv06359
Plaintiff:
LORENZO REYES
Defendant:
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC., SIMOS INSOURCING SOLUTIONS, INC. and MARK ALIPERTI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
POLPA SAO PEDRO INDUSTRIA COMERCIO LTD et al v. JUNGLE TRADING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
POLPA SAO PEDRO INDUSTRIA COMERCIO LTD and BELA ACAI POLPAS DE FRUTAS INDUSTRIA, LTD.
Defendant:
JUNGLE TRADING COMPANY, LLC, Tropical Life Source LLC and AUGUSTO SIMOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
EAMES et al v. SONOMA, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01570
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BRYAN EAMES and PATRICIA EAMES
Defendant:
WILLIAMS SONOMA, INC., SIMOS INSOURCING SOLUTIONS LLC and TRUEBLUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
EAMES et al v. SONOMA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01570
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BRYAN EAMES and PATRICIA EAMES
Defendant:
WILLIAMS SONOMA, INC., SIMOS INSOURCING SOLUTIONS LLC and TRUEBLUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COUTINHO v. BRASKEM S.A. et al
as 1:2020cv11366
Defendant:
BRASKEM S.A., FERNANDO MUSA, PEDRO VAN LANGENDONCK TEIXEIRA DE FREITAS and others
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIO COUTINHO
COUTINHO v. BRASKEM S.A. et al
as 2:2020cv11366
Defendant:
BRASKEM S.A., FERNANDO MUSA, PEDRO VAN LANGENDONCK TEIXEIRA DE FREITAS and others
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIO COUTINHO
ROMERO v. CHURRASQUERIA MARINA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv09353
Defendant:
CHURRASQUERIA MARINA, INC., BRINEL and PAULO SIMOES
Plaintiff:
PEDRO ORTEGA ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
