Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Flores v. Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company
as 1:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Raymond Flores
Defendant:
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company v. Infrassure LTD
as 2:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company
Defendant:
Infrassure LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company v. Infrassure LTD
as 2:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company
Defendant:
Infrassure LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company v. A&B Builders Ltd et al
as 2:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company
Defendant:
A&B Builders Ltd, Matrix Engineering Ltd, Howe-Baker Engineers Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
United States of America v. Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company
as 2:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company v. Pro-Inspect Inc
as 2:2012cv00196
Plaintiff:
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company
Defendant:
Pro-Inspect Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company et al
as 2:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company, Sinclair Casper Refining Company and Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
