Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sir Giorgio Clardy v. Brandon Kelly
as 21-35924
Petitioner / Appellant:
SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY
Respondent / Appellee:
BRANDON KELLY
Sir Giorgio Clardy v. Jones, et al
as 20-36056
Defendant / Appellee:
STEINER, JUDY GILMORE, MOONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY
Clardy et al v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2020cv00744
Plaintiff:
Alexis Gonzalez, Unnamed Multnomah County Inmates, Adonis Thompson and others
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, Michael Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clardy v. Reese
as 3:2019cv01132
Defendant:
Michael Reese
Petitioner:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sir Giorgio Clardy v. Tracie McFarlane, et al
as 19-35530
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, RONNIE FOSS, CRAIG PRINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY
Sir Giorgio Clardy, et al v. Todd Byerly, et al
as 19-35419
Defendant / Appellee:
GABRIELL GITNES, DANIELLE FUZI, COLETTE S. PETERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY
Plaintiff:
UNNAMED O.D.O.C. PRISONERS
Clardy v. McFarlane et al
as 6:2018cv02175
Defendant:
Jane Wagner, Craig Prins, Kelly Rath and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clardy et al v. Byerly et al
as 6:2018cv01200
Defendant:
Todd Byerly, Danielle Fuzi, Jane Jung and others
Plaintiff:
Unnamed O.D.O.C. Prisoners and Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clardy v. Gulick et al
as 2:2017cv00503
Defendant:
"John or Jane" Bristol, Robb Doe, Dr. Garth Gulick and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Jones et al
as 2:2017cv00178
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Matthew Barba, Jason Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
