Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tarquino et al v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00443
Plaintiff:
Joan Carol Tarquino and Sisto Tarquino
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer US Inc., Zimmer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Sistos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons DHO
as 1:2018cv08116
Petitioner:
Rex Sistos
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons DHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Rizzo v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05313
Defendant:
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) Lin and Stefan J. Murry
Movant:
Philip R. Deubler, Jr., Lawrence Rougier and Daniel Sisto
Plaintiff:
Gianluca Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Abreu v. Travers et al
as 9:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Travers, Lashway, Kornigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Fischer et al
as 9:2013cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Joseph Bellinier, David A. Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Williams et al
as 9:2012cv01892
Plaintiff:
John H. White
Defendant:
P. Williams, R. Macwilliams, W. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Williams et al
as 9:2012cv01775
Plaintiff:
John White
Defendant:
Patricia L. Williams, Richard MacWilliams, C. Demers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Clark et al
as 9:2012cv00986
Plaintiff:
John H. White
Defendant:
Jeffrey Clark, Shawn C. Conto, Michael Sisto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sisto v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv02258
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Christy Sisto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Flemming v. Rock et al
as 9:2011cv01119
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
David Rock, Albert Prack, Gerald J. Otis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
