Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Richard Sharif, et al v. William Stevens
as 19-3149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAIFA SHARIFEH, as Executix of the Estate of Soad Wattar, RICHARD SHARIF and ESTATE OF SOAD WATTAR
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM J. STEVENS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08508
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor In Possession:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Soad Wattar, et al v. Horace Fox, Jr.
as 17-1615
Debtor:
In the Matter of: RICHARD SHARIF
Appellant:
SOAD WATTAR, HAIFA SHARIFEH and RAGDA SHARIFEH
Appellee:
HORACE FOX, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11076
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04699
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10694
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Richard Sharif v. Wellness International Network, et al
as 09-11235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SHARIF, As Agent for Soad Wattar
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLNESS INTERNATIONAL NETWORK LTD, also known as WIN, RALPH OATS, CATHY OATS and others
Sharif, et al v. Wellness Intl Ntwrk, et al
as 08-10866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SHARIF, As Agent for Soad Wattar, Haifa Kaj, and Ragda Sharifeh, WAQAR KHAN, SHAFQUT KHAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLNESS INTERNATIONAL NETWORK LTD, also known as WIN, RALPH OATS, CATHY OATS and others
Sharif, et al v. Wellness Intl Ntwrk, et al
as 07-10834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SHARIF, As Agent for Soad Wattar, Haifa Kaj and Ragda Sharifeh, WAQAR KHAN, SHAFQUT KHAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLNESS INTERNATIONAL NETWORK LTD, also known as WIN, RALPH OATS, CATHY OATS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
