Cases 31 - 40 of 56
NORTH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2017cv01889
Plaintiff:
CHARLES NORTH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINS v. SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS et al
as 1:2016cv01565
Plaintiff:
BARRY HUTCHINS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS, ROBERT SHERMAN, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEENEY KENNEDY v. PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01121
Plaintiff:
LON R. SWEENEY KENNEDY
Defendant:
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA, SOCIAL SECURITY AGENCY and VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FLETCHER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2016cv00613
Petitioner:
DEBORAH DIANE FLETCHER
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LISENKO v. GOVERNMENT OF QUEBEC
as 1:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE LISENKO
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF QUEBEC, SUPERIOR COURT OF QUEBEC, GOVERNMENT OF CANADA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Habtamu Daniel v. Maryland Police Department, et al
as 15-5148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Habtamu Daniel
Defendant - Appellee:
Maryland Police Department, District of Columbia Housing Authority, Alexandria Housing Authority and others
DANIEL v. MARYLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv00603
Plaintiff:
HABTAMU DANIEL
Defendant:
MARYLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, DC HOUSING AUTHORITY, ALEXANDRIA HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
COSBY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2014cv01855
Plaintiff:
LEONA COSBY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
