Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hernandez-Alomar v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2023cv01536
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Hernandez-Alomar
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
v. Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General
as 3:2019cv01015
Petitioner:
Dr. Americo Oms-Rivera
Respondent:
Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Pena Martinez et al v. US Department of Health and Human Services
as 3:2018cv01206
Plaintiff:
Sixta Gladys Pena-Martinez , Nelida Santiago-Alvarez , Juan Ramon Velez Marrero and others
Defendant:
US Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M Azar, Sonny Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ramos-Caldero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv03171
Petitioner:
Cretchen Ramos-Caldero
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Febus-Vazquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv02131
Plaintiff:
Danny Febus-Vazquez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Marquez
as 3:2015cv02127
Plaintiff:
Joselito Marquez and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lopez-Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv01669
Plaintiff:
Harain Lopez-Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Rivera-De Jesus v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2013cv01642
Plaintiff:
Edgar Rafael Rivera-De Jesus
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Medicare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Reedom v. Commisioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv01619
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Reedom
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
