Cases 1 - 6 of 6
National Interstate Insurance Company et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
as 1:2016cv00670
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company, Sorbara Construction Corp. and Zurich American Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
National Interstate Insurance Company and New York Crane & Equipment Corp.
212) 967-4258 (fax:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of New York Crane & Equipment Corp., et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
National Interstate Insurance Company et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
as 1:2016cv00275
Plaintiff:
National Interstate Insurance Company and New York Crane & Equipment Corp.
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company, Sorbara Construction Corp. and Lexington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Cross Country Construction et al v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2015cv05215
Petitioner:
Cross Country Construction , Roger & Sons Concrete, Inc. , Sorbara Construction Corp. and others
Respondent:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
National Interstate Insurance Company et al v. Sorbara Construction Corp.
as 2:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
National Interstate Insurance Company and JF Lomma, Inc.
Defendant:
Sorbara Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Interstate Insurance Company et al v. Sorbara Construction Corp.
as 1:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
National Interstate Insurance Company and JF Lomma, Inc.
Defendant:
Sorbara Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
