Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 161
ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01259
Plaintiff: STANFORD HEALTH CARE, ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as ALAMEDA HOSPITAL doing business as HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION doing business as CHINESE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00972
Plaintiff: LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Southern California Edison Company v. Old Republic General Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv01419
Plaintiff: Southern California Edison Company
Defendant: Old Republic General Insurance Company, Navigator Specialty Insurance Company and Endurance American Specialty Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
University of Southern California et al v. Health Plan of Nevada Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv10520
Plaintiff: University of Southern California on behalf of its Keck Medical Center of USC dba Keck Hospital of USC and dba USC Norris Cancer Hospital, and on behalf of its USC Verdugo Hills Hospital and University of Southern California on behalf of its Keck Medical Center of USC doing business as Keck Hospital of USC doing business as USC Norris Cancer Hospital on behalf of its USC Verduo Hills Hospital
Defendant: Health Plan of Nevada, Inc., Sierra Health and Life Insurance Company, Inc., Sierra Health Care Options, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Latoya Pratcher v. Prospect Medical Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09508
Plaintiff: Latoya Pratchier
Defendant: Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc., Southern California Hospital Healthcare System, Inc., Prospect Medical Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Southern California Health and Welfare Fund et al v. On Point Engineering Contractors, a California corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09013
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Southern California Health and Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Southern California Pension Trust, Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Southern California Individual Retirement Account Defined Contribution Trust and others
Defendant: On Point Engineering Contractors
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Funds
RLI Insurance Company v. Hospital Association of Southern California et al
as 2:2023cv08932
Plaintiff: RLI Insurance Company
Defendant: Hospital Association of Southern California, National Health Foundation and George Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Type: Contract Insurance
GN Hearing Care Corporation d/b/a Beltone Electronics v. Leiterman et al
as 1:2023cv13945
Plaintiff: GN Hearing Care Corporation d/b/a Beltone Electronics
Defendant: Jonathan Leiterman and SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AUDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
James Hightower v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital et al
as 5:2023cv01506
Plaintiff: James Hightower
Defendant: Kaiser Foundation Hospital (KFH) doing business as Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Permanente Medical Group and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
ALTA BATES MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv01602
Plaintiff: ALTA BATES MEDICAL CENTER, ALTA BATES SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER, CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?