Cases
Board of Trustees of the Glazing Health and Welfare Trust et al v. Combos Glass, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01837
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Glazing Health and Welfare Trust, Board of Trustees of the Southern Nevada and California Glaziers, Fabricators, Painters and Floorcoverers Pension Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the Southern Nevada Painters and Decorators and Glaziers Labor-Management Cooperation Committee Trust and others
Defendant: Combos Glass, Inc., Genoa Glass Inc., Christopher Ronald Combos and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Southern California Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Health and Welfare Trust et al v. Pinnacle Installations, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv07117
Plaintiff: Painters and Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Fund, Southern California Glass and Glazing Industry Trust Fund, Southern California Glazing and Architectural Metal Industry Labor-Management Cooperation Committee Trust and others
Defendant: Wesco Insurance Company and Pinnacle Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The Boards of Trustees of the Southern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Health and Welfare Trust v. QOL Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02143
Plaintiff: THE BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GLAZIERS, ARCHITECTURAL METAL AND GLASS WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, COLORADO, AND SOUTHERN NEVADA GLAZIERS, ARCHIT, Southern California Glass and Glazing Industry Trust Fund, Southern California Glazing and Architectural Metal Industry Labor-Management Cooperation Committee Trust and others
Defendant: QOL CORP., a California corporation doing business as CUSTOM ENGINEERED OPENINGS, QOL Corp. and QOL Corp. a California corporation doing business as CUSTOM ENGINEERED OPENINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Southern California Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Worker Health and Welfare Trust v. Chino Glass and Glazing Corp.
as 2:2018cv05394
Defendant: Chino Glass and Glazing Corp.
Plaintiff: Finishing Trades Institute of District Council 36 Joint Apprenticeship Training Trust Fund, Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Local Union No. 636, International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Finishing Trades Institute and others
Southern California Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Health and Welfare Trust v. Huntington Glazing, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05096
Plaintiff: Finishing Trades Institute of District Council 36 Joint Apprenticeship Training Trust Fund, Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Local Union No. 636, International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Finishing Trades Institute and others
Defendant: Huntington Glazing, Inc.
The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Glaziers Architechtural Metal and Glass Workers et al v. All American Automatic Door Services, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv08875
Defendant: All American Automatic Door Services, Inc. and Does
Unknown: David E Dukes
Plaintiff: The Boards of Trustee of the Southern California Glaziers, Architechtural Metal and Glass Workers Health and Welfare Fund, The Boards of Trustees of the Finishing Trades Institute of District Council 36 Joint Apprenticeship Training Trust Fund, The Boards of Trustees of the Glaziers Architechtural Metal and Glass Workers Local Union No. 636 and others
The Board of Trustees of The Southern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Health and Welfare Fund, et al v. Anees Mufti, et al
as 2:2017cv06087
Defendant: Anees Mufti, Does, Anees Mufti and others
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees for The Finishing Trades Institute, The Board of Trustees for The Finishing Trades Institute of District Council 36 Joint Apprenticeship Training Fund, The Board of Trustees for The Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Disability Fund and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?