Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Clorissa Porter, et al v. Southern NV Adult Mental Healt, et al
as 18-15360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLORISSA D. PORTER and WILLIAM D. SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN NEVADA ADULT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, a mental health treatment operation licensed by the State of Nevada, AKA Rawson-Neal Psychiatric Hospital, CHELSEA SZKLANY, and as Hospital Administrator re: Southerm Nevada Adult Mental Health Services, LINDA J. WHITE, and as statewide Psychiatric Medical Director of the State of Nevada and others
Porter et al v. Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services et al
as 2:2016cv02949
Defendant:
Chelsea Szklany, Kyle Devine, M.D. Jacob Manjooran and others
Plaintiff:
Clorissa D. Porter and William D. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
James Brown v. Rawson-Neal Psychiatric Hospit, et al
as 14-16458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FLAVY COY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
RAWSON-NEAL PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, LEON RAVIN, Dr., ANURAG GUPTA, Dr. and others
Brown v. Rawson-Neal Psychiatric Hospital et al
as 2:2013cv01039
Defendant:
Johnathan Blum, Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services, Kyle Devin and others
Plaintiff:
James Flavy Coy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. University Medical Center
as 2:2007cv01378
Plaintiff:
Theodore J. Thompson
Defendant:
University Medical Center, Mariam Marvasti, Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
