Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GOKHBERG v. SOVEREIGN BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01884
Plaintiff:
YURY GOKHBERG
Defendant:
SOVEREIGN BANCORP, INC. , SOVEREIGN BANK , BANCO SANTANDER, S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01141
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
FELDMAN v. CHASE HOME FINANCE et al
as 2:2010mc00016
Plaintiff:
LYNN E. FELDMAN
Defendant:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, CHASE HOME FINANCE, CHASE HOME FINANCE and others
Trustee:
LYNN E. FELDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
BANKS v. SOVEREIGN BANCORP. INC.
as 2:2008cv06003
Plaintiff:
ROBYN L. BANKS
Defendant:
SOVEREIGN BANCORP. INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WENTWORTH v. SOVEREIGN BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01991
Plaintiff:
GAIL WENTWORTH
Defendant:
SOVEREIGN BANCORP, INC., SOVEREIGN'S RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN COMMITTEE, SOVEREIGN BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SCHMALZ v. SOVEREIGN BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00857
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL SCHMALZ
Defendant:
SOVEREIGN BANCORP, INC., JOSEPH P. CAMPANELLI, MARK R. MCCOLLOM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
