Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Simmons et al v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Samantha Simmons, Ansleigh Walters, Marykay Thrower and others
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Spivey v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Heather Marie Spivey
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Cassidy et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01443
Plaintiff:
MARY CASSIDY, CHARLES ALLEN, RANDALL ALLISON and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Spivey v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01254
Plaintiff:
Heather Marie Spivey
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Spivey et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2014cv00170
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Plaintiff:
Francese Spivey and George Spivey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spivey v. USA
as 3:2013cv01570
Plaintiff:
Shermisha Spivey
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Spivey v. United States Of America
as 2:2013cv01570
Plaintiff:
Shermisha Spivey
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
