Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Burger v. US
as 24-1249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BASIL AGAPION, SOPHIA S. AGAPION, KATHE BURGER and others
Plaintiff:
GUILFORD BUILDERS SUPPLY CO.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Chapman Spring/Garden, LLC v. US
as 24-1250
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAPMAN SPRING/GARDEN, LLC, CHANEY-FRYE #4, LLC, D.S. CHANEY PROPERTIES #6, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Murray v. US
as 23-2287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MURRAY and SPOUT SPRINGS MOUNTAIN RESORT
Plaintiff:
NANCY MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
EDMUNDSON et al
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
MELANIE F. EDMUNDSON, MIRANDA S. TODD, PAMELA C. TODD PITTS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P. v. Powder Springs Logistics, LLC
as 23-1274
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS L.P.
Defendant / Appellant:
POWDER SPRINGS LOGISTICS, LLC and MAGELLAN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P. v. Powder Springs Logistics, LLC
as 23-1218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS L.P.
Defendant / Appellee:
POWDER SPRINGS LOGISTICS, LLC and MAGELLAN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
Banes v. US
as 21-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS, GEORGE MANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Pena v. US
as 21-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHRYN B. ZIEMBA, HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Sunoco Partners Marketing v. Magellan Midstream Partners
as 20-1720
Appellee:
MAGELLAN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. and POWDER SPRINGS LOGISTICS, LLC
Appellant:
SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS L.P.
Sunoco Partners Marketing v. Magellan Midstream Partners
as 20-1719
Appellee:
MAGELLAN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. and POWDER SPRINGS LOGISTICS, LLC
Appellant:
SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS L.P.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
