Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Giles v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Krashunda Giles
Defendant:
Spring Oaks Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carlisle v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Amanda Carlisle
Defendant:
Spring Oaks Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bibb County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company Inc
as 7:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
Bibb County, Alabama, Cherokee County, Alabama, City of Cullman, Alabama and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bullock County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
Bullock County, Alabama, Chilton County, Alabama, City of Auburn, Alabama and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Davidson v. Spring Oak Capital LLC
as 3:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Davidson
Defendant:
Spring Oak Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
