Cases 21 - 30 of 31
United States of America v. Wright et al
as 5:2012cv04061
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Lynn Wright, Juanita Maybury, Cheyenne County KS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
First Pentecostal Church of Bonner Springs, Inc. v. GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2011cv02509
Plaintiff:
First Pentecostal Church of Bonner Springs, Inc.
Defendant:
GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Olmo-Artau v. Farr et al
as 2:2011cv02148
Plaintiff:
Nester Olmo-Artau
Defendant:
Daniel Farr, John Haley and Bonner Springs, Kansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Snow v. GPH Spring Hill, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02162
Plaintiff:
Sharon Snow
Defendant:
GPH Spring Hill, LLC, GGNSC Equity Holdings, LLC and GGNSC Spring Hill, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carpenter Co. et al v. BASF SE et al
as 2:2008cv02617
Plaintiff:
Carpenter Co., Carpenter Canada Co., E.R. Carpenter, L.P. and others
Defendant:
BASF SE, BASF Corporation, BASF Canada, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barton v. Pierce et al
as 2:2008cv02538
Plaintiff:
Cody Barton
Defendant:
Tim Pierce, Unified School District #204, Robert J. Van Maren and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barton v. Pierce et al
as 2:2007cv02526
Plaintiff:
Cody Barton
Defendant:
Tim Pierce, Unified School District #204, Robert J Van Maren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc v. Blue Springs Hotel Development, LLC et al
as 2:2007mc00214
Plaintiff:
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc
Defendant:
Blue Springs Hotel Development, LLC and John Likins
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
