Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 174
Oscar Marquez v. Daniel Sproul
as 23-3355
Petitioner / Appellant: OSCAR A. MARQUEZ
Respondent / Appellee: DANIEL SPROUL, Warden
Rezaq v. Sproul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03189
Petitioner: Omar M Rezaq, Omar Mohammed Rezaq and Nazeer Newaf Mohammed Hamed
Defendant: Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv03063
Petitioner: Robert K. Decker
Respondent: Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sellers v. Sproul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02903
Petitioner: Richard Sellers
Respondent: Warden Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitfield v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv02855
Petitioner: Landon A Whitfield
Respondent: Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitfield v. Sproul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02687
Petitioner: Landon A Whitfield
Respondent: Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv02482
Petitioner: Robert K. Decker
Respondent: Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bertram v. Sproul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02198
Petitioner: Eric Nelson Bertram
Respondent: Warden Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shawn Christy v. Daniel Sproul
as 23-1940
Petitioner / Appellant: SHAWN R. CHRISTY
Respondent / Appellee: DANIEL SPROUL
Pemberton v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv01370
Petitioner: Devin A. Pemberton
Respondent: USA, USP Marion and Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?