Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Spy Optic, Inc. v. AreaTrend, LLC, et al
as 20-55438
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1-10, inclusive and AREATREND, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SPY OPTIC, INC., a California corporation
Spy Optic Inc. v. AreaTrend, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01770
Defendant:
AreaTrend, LLC and DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
Spy Optic Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Spy Optic Inc v. caiyunhengton 168 9 et al
as 2:2017cv07649
Defendant:
2.95886, 256ctl, 4318964 and others
Plaintiff:
Spy Optic Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Spy Optic Inc. v. globalbabysupplier, et al
as 2:2017cv04532
Defendant:
4zhiutemhuanh, Does, Wellcomeyou2014 and others
Plaintiff:
Spy Optic Inc.
Spy Optic Inc. v. Alibaba.com Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00659
Defendant:
Ali Baba Group Holding Limited, Alibaba.com Hong Kong Limited, Alibaba.com Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Spy Optic Inc.
Unknown:
Michael Marchand
Spy Optic, Inc. v. Alibaba.com Inc et al
as 3:2014cv04527
Plaintiff:
Spy Optic, Inc.
Defendant:
Alibaba.com, Inc. and Alibaba Hong Kong Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Spy Optic, Inc. v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02123
Plaintiff:
Spy Optic, Inc.
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc., Minu Mandanis and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Spy Optic, Inc. v. Pepper's Performance Eyewear, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00159
Plaintiff:
Spy Optic, Inc.
Defendant:
Pepper's Performance Eyewear, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spy Optic, Inc. v. Jay-y Enterprise Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01508
Plaintiff:
Spy Optic, Inc.
Defendant:
Jay-y Enterprise Co., Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spy Optic Inc v. West Coast Deals Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00384
Plaintiff:
Spy Optic Inc
Defendant:
West Coast Deals Inc and DOES
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
