Cases 1 - 8 of 8
The Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis v. Conterno et al
as 1:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
The Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis
Defendant:
Enrique Conterno, James A. Schoeneck, K. Peony Yu and others
Nominal Defendant:
FibroGen, Inc.
Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis v. Hemsley et al
as 1:2018cv00728
Plaintiff:
Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated , Stephen J. Hemsley , David S. Wichmann and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Amalgamated Bank , Coral Springs Police Officers' Retirement Plan and Central Laborers Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
St. Louis v. Haller et al
as 1:2016cv00356
Plaintiff:
James St. Louis
Defendant:
Karl Haller, Carole Dunn and Melanie Withers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00022
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
United Access Technologies LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00338
Plaintiff:
United Access Technologies LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., Ameritech Services Inc., AT&T Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
In Re: James St. Louis
as 1:2009mc00044
Safety Braking Corporation et al v. Six Flags Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00127
Plaintiff:
Safety Braking Corporation, Magnetar Technologies Corp. and G&T Conveyor Co.
Defendant:
Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., Tierco Maryland Inc., Busch Entertainment Corp. and others
Counter Claimant:
Tierco Maryland Inc., Cedar Fair LP, Paramount Parks Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Safety Braking Corporation, Magnetar Technologies Corp., G&T Conveyor Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
St. Louis v. Marshall et al
as 1:2007cv00084
Plaintiff:
James St. Louis
Defendant:
Eva Marshall, Chris Fowler, Melanie Withers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
