Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Staffing Network Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03247
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Staffing Network Holdings, LLC, WWIL Personnel, LLC, WJI Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Vee Pak, Inc., et al v. Joe Eagle, et al
as 23-8005
Petitioner:
VEE PAK, INC., VEE PAK, LLC, doing business as VOYANT BEAUTY and STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, LLC
Respondent:
JOE EAGLE, MICHAEL KEYS, JAMES ZOLLICOFFER and others
Management Registry, Inc. v. Naif et al
as 3:2018cv00284
Plaintiff:
Management Registry, Inc.
Defendant:
Brandon Naif and Staffing Network Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Management Registry, Inc. v. Calvetti
as 3:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
Management Registry, Inc.
Defendant:
Maria Calvetti , Staffing Network Holdings, LLC and Starr Delia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Management Registry, Inc. v. Starr Delia
as 3:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
Management Registry, Inc.
Defendant:
Starr Delia and Staffing Network Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Hopkins v. Staffing Network Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv07907
Defendant:
Staffing Network Holdings, LLC and Quality Placement Authority, LLC
Plaintiff:
Akeem Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
NLRB v. Staffing Network Holdings, LLC
as 15-1582
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, LLC
Staffing Network Holdings, LLC v. NLRB
as 15-1354
Petitioner:
STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, LLC
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
