Cases 31 - 40 of 45
JONES v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv06601
Plaintiff:
ARLENE JONES
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DONNELLY v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv06519
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. DONNELLY
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_claimant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
JOHN P. DONNELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARROW v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv06457
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. GARROW
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARKIJOHN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARKIJOHN
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SHORROW v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv07602
Plaintiff:
SHARON SHORROW
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY , GENUITY, INC. and GENUITY, INC. DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN OF GENUITY INC.
Counter_claimant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
SHARON SHORROW
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
FALKOWSKI v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2010cv04998
Plaintiff:
STANLEY FALKOWSKI
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY and J.S. HOVANIAN & SONS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337
MCMURDY v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2010cv00253
Plaintiff:
SHARON MCMURDY
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
O'REILLY v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv01676
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P. O'REILLY and TIMOTHY P. O'REILLY
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD v. THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2009cv05518
Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD
Defendant:
THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HORSTMAN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv00422
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HORSTMAN
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
