Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stanton v. Buckwalk
as 6:2017cv01826
Respondent:
Dan Buckwalk
Petitioner:
Lamar Lee Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherman v. Stanton et al
as 3:2017cv01696
Defendant:
Multnomah County Board of Parole & Post Prison Supervision and Daniel Stanton
Plaintiff:
Roslyn A. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Stanton et al
as 3:2017cv01507
Respondent:
Multnomah Cty Board of Parole & Post Prison Supervision and Daniel Stanton
Petitioner:
Roslyn Ann Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hays v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2015cv01874
Petitioner:
Mark Alan Hays
Respondent:
Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, Oregon Department of Corrections, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanfill v. Sheriff Stanton et al
as 3:2014cv00874
Defendant:
C.O. Carter, C.O. Chin and Sheriff Stanton
Plaintiff:
Renee Stanfill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voth v. Stanton
as 6:2013cv00396
Respondent:
Daniel Stanton
Petitioner:
Frank Everett Voth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Karboau v. City of Portland et al
as 6:2011cv00679
Defendant:
Patrick Callahan, City of Portland, County of Multnomah Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Milaudi Karboau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Stanton
as 3:2011cv00409
Plaintiff:
Kenneth P. Morrow
Defendant:
Sheriff Dan Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Stanton
as 6:2011cv00409
Plaintiff:
Kenneth P. Morrow
Defendant:
Sheriff Dan Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Stanton
as 3:2011cv00305
Plaintiff:
Kenneth P. Morrow
Defendant:
Dan Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
