Cases 11 - 20 of 33
DAOUD v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION dba STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv19106
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION dba STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah DAOUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daoud v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION dba STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv18906
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION dba STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Deborah Daoud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv16567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ROSER v. TARGET CORP. et al
as 2:2020cv12503
Defendant:
TARGET HACKENSACK T-1330, JOHN DOE 1-10, STARBUCKS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
SHAYNA ROSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ELAFNY v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv07780
Plaintiff:
SALWA ELAFNY
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, STARBUCKS AT WOODBRIDGE CENTER MALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MONTELBANO v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv05221
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Montelbano
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUMENTA v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv03319
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
Shannon Aumenta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv19432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COHEN v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2019cv02062
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I - X and STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GRANDE v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv12010
Defendant:
TWO SIX TWO S. 18TH ASSOCI., STARBUCKS CORPORATION, HOWARD S. SCHULTZ and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. GRANDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
