Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Nayman v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv05816
Defendant:
Paula Boggs, Esq., Christopher C. Paci, Esq. and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Irwin Nayman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wessel v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 7:2017cv06703
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wessel
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Starbucks New Venture Company, PepsiCo, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shapiro v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2017cv04129
Plaintiff:
Doreen Shapiro
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffe Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Headley v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv03990
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Headley
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
O'Leary v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2017cv03891
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Leary
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Montauk Juice Factory Inc. et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2017cv02678
Plaintiff:
The End Brooklyn and Montauk Juice Factory Inc.
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Lavoro v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2017cv01253
Plaintiff:
Lauren Lavoro
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kazachkova v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01531
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Anna Kazachkova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstead v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2017cv01163
Plaintiff:
Ebony Armstead
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
