Cases 11 - 20 of 36,529
Burnham (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01397
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
State of Colorado and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Brewer
as 24-6096
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEYON MARQUIS BREWER
Toj-Riz v. Garland
as 24-9533
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO TOJ-RIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Maldonado v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Frankie Maldonado
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pacheco et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Yvonne S. Pacheco and Donald D. Pacheco
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jourdan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Jourdan
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Chino v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Earl Chino
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Western Energy Alliance et al v. Haaland et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior Secretary, United States Bureau of Land Management and Deb Haaland
Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance, Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico, New Mexico Oil & Gas Association and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Mink v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024cv00484
Petitioner:
Damon Lee Mink
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
