Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18,205
USA v. Lafon Ellis
as 24-1914
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LAFON ELLIS
USA v. Loren Clark, Jr.
as 24-1892
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LOREN B. CLARK, JR.
Esmelin Guzman-Guzman, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1916
Petitioner: ESMELIN GUZMAN-GUZMAN and S. M.-G.
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF AND EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS AS SUCCESSORS TO KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. MCFAUL MILLWORK SOLUTIONS INC.
as 1:2024cv06078
Petitioner: EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF AND EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS AS SUCCESSORS TO KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Respondent: MCFAUL MILLWORK SOLUTIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Indiana State of v. Express Scripts Administrators et al
as 2:2024cv06068
Plaintiff: Indiana State of
Defendant: EXPRESS SCRIPTS ADMINISTRATORS LLC. doing business as EXPRESS SCRIPTS, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
USA v. Xavier Josey
as 24-1891
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: XAVIER JOSEY
USA v. Zhi Dong
as 24-1895
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ZHI DONG
USA v. Francis Battista
as 24-1876
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FRANCIS J. BATTISTA, a/k/a FRANK BATTISTA
USA v. James Smelko
as 24-1845
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES SMELKO
Carlos Martinez-Sanchez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1905
Petitioner: CARLOS ANDRES MARTINEZ-SANCHEZ, GLORIA VERONICA BERMESO-FERNANDEZ, C. S. M.-B. and others
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?