Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Jamil v. Vermont Judiciary & Judicial Administration et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Taifoor Jamil
Defendant:
State of Vermont Judiciary & Judicial Administration, T.J. Donovan, William Sorrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swint v. Wray et al
as 2:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., William Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tendo v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Steven Tendo
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro N. Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Lamothe v. Federal Court Clerks et al
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lamothe
Defendant:
Federal Court Clerks and State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gagne v. Deml
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gagne
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml, State of Vermont and CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jones v. Vermont State Police
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Vermont State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Vermont State Police
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Vermont State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Vermont- Judicial Bureau v. Dixon
as 2:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
State of Vermont- Judicial Bureau
Defendant:
Ryan Adam Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
