Cases 41 - 50 of 18,368
USA v. Isreal Easterday
as 24-3053
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isreal Easterday, also known as Isreal Easterday
USA v. Felipe Martinez
as 24-3052
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Felipe Antonio Martinez, also known as Tony
Fida Mustafa Chohan v. DOS
as 24-5126
Plaintiff:
Fida Ul Mustafa Chohan
Defendant:
United States Department of State
TikTok Inc., et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1113
Petitioner:
TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Ltd.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States,
MATHIS et al v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
W. MATHIS and K. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
IGOREVICH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
SIVOKONEV PAVEL IGOREVICH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VERMA v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
ANAND VERMA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GPA Midstream Association v. EPA, et al
as 24-1111
Petitioner:
GPA Midstream Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
United States Steel Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1109
Petitioner:
United States Steel Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. v. EPA, et al
as 24-1110
Petitioner:
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
