Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 93
ALLEN v. STATE OF NEVADA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01110
Petitioner: GENE ANTHONY ALLEN
Respondent: STATE OF NEVADA, 8TH J.D.C. CLARK COUNTY and RENEE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA ex. re. Laurence Schneider, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-7003
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider, State of California, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider, State of Delaware, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Laurence Robert Schneider
Defendant - Appellee: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Chase Home Finance, LLC
State of Oklahoma, et al v. FCC, et al
as 16-1339
Petitioner: State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Joseph M. Allbaugh, Interim Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 16-5220
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Interested Party - Appellant: Lindsay Jenkins
Matthew Grace, et al v. DC, et al
as 16-7067
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety, State of Montana, State of Hawaii and others
Defendant / Appellant: Peter Newsham, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department, Cathy L. Lanier, in her official capacity as Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department and District of Columbia
Plaintiff / Appellee: Matthew Grace and Pink Pistols
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Joe, et al v. FCC, et al
as 16-1057
Petitioner: State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Joseph M. Allbaugh, Interim Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, John Whetsel, Sheriff of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma and The Oklahoma Sheriffs' Association, on behalf of its members
Respondent - Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Indiana Sheriff's Association, Marion County Sheriff's Office, Lake County Sheriff's Department and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00199
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant: HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC. , HSBC BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee: OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant: Christopher Stoller
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 14-5247
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Movant - Appellant: Daniel J. Levitan
USA ex rel. Todd Heath v. AT&T, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-7094
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. Todd Heath, State of California, Attorney General's Office; California Department of Justice. ex rel. Todd Heath, State of Delaware, Department of Justice; Attorney General's Office, ex rel. Todd Heath and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Todd Heath
Defendant - Appellee: AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corp., doing business as AT&T Advanced Solutions, AT&T Datacomm, Inc., doing business as AT&T Datacomm and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?